Responsibilities of editors, reviewers, and authors concerning publication ethics and publication malpractice are described in the Guidelines on Publication Ethics.
CORRECTIONS AND RETRACTIONS
In accordance with the generally accepted standards of scholarly publishing, JMLE does not alter articles after publication (with the exception of errors due to copyediting): "Articles that have been published should remain extant, exact and unaltered to the maximum extent possible." In cases of serious errors or (suspected) misconduct, JMLE publishes corrections and retractions (expressions of concern).
In cases of serious errors that affect or significantly impair the reader’s understanding or evaluation of the article, the JMLE publishes a correction note that is linked to the published article. The published article will be left unchanged.
- there is clear evidence that findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g., data fabrication) or honest error (e.g. miscalculation)
- findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper cross-referencing, permission or justification (i.e. cases of redundant publication)
- the manuscript turns out to be an act of plagiarism
- the manuscript reports unethical research.
An article is retracted by publishing a retraction notice that is linked to or replaces the retracted article. JMLE will make any effort to clearly identify a retracted article as such. If an investigation is underway that might result in the retraction of an article, JMLE may choose to alert readers by publishing an expression of concern.
JMLE’s Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement is based, in large part, on the guidelines and standards developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). The relevant duties and expectations of authors, reviewers, and editors of the Journal are described below.
Responsibilities of Authors
By submitting a manuscript to JMLE, authors warrant that the manuscript is their original work, and that it has neither been published previously nor is currently being considered for publication elsewhere. They also warrant that the sources of any ideas and/or words in the manuscript that are not their own have been properly attributed through appropriate citations and/or quotes.
An author should not normally publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in multiple journals or publication venues. Such redundant publication is generally considered to constitute unethical publishing behavior, and, if discovered, may result in a manuscript under consideration being rejected, or a published article being retracted. Authors of manuscripts reporting on original research should present an accurate account of the work performed, accompanied by an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the manuscript. The manuscript should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. The fabrication of results and the making of fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and may be a cause for rejection or retraction of a manuscript or published article.
Where the manuscript reports on commercial software, hardware, or other products, authors must include a declaration at the beginning of the manuscript in which they must either state that no conflict of interest exists or describe the nature of any potential conflict. All sources of financial support for the research should also be disclosed in the manuscript.
Authors of a manuscript agree that if the manuscript is accepted for publication in the Journal of Media Literacy Education, the published article will be copyrighted using a Creative Commons “Attribution 4.0 International” license. This license allows authors to retain copyright, and allows anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute and/or copy the final version of the paper. Works must be properly attributed to their authors. It is not necessary to ask further permissions both from authors or the Journal Board, although you are kindly requested, as a professional courtesy, to inform the Board for every reuse of the papers.
Authors are responsible for obtaining written permission to include any images or artwork for which they do not hold copyright in their articles, or to adapt any such images or artwork for inclusion in their articles. The copyright holder must be made explicitly aware that the image(s) or artwork will be made freely available online as part of the article under the Creative Commons “Attribution 4.0 International” license.
The authors’ names should be listed on the article in order of their contribution to the article, and all authors take responsibility for their own contributions. Only those individuals who have made a substantive contribution should be listed as authors; those whose contributions are indirect or marginal (e.g., colleagues or supervisors who have reviewed drafts of the work or provided proofreading assistance, and heads of research institutes/centers/labs) should be named in an “Acknowledgments” section at the end of the article, immediately preceding the Reference List. The corresponding author must ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the article, and that all listed co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the article and agreed to its publication.
Where an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in an article of his/hers that has been published in the Journal of Media Literacy Education, he/she has an obligation to promptly notify the Editors and cooperate with them to correct the article or retract it as appropriate. Examples of significant errors include misleading information, incorrect attribution, and any mistake that changes the meaning of the article, including equations, tables, and figures it contains. We will consider a spelling mistake that affects the meaning of the paper to be a significant error.
Responsibilities of Reviewers
JMLE reviewers perform work for the Journal on a volunteer basis. Given that most of these individuals are in full-time employment, their reviewing activities for JMLE must, by necessity, not be their top priority. Reviewers are free to decline invitations to review particular manuscripts at their discretion, for example, if their current employment workload and/or other commitments make it prohibitive for them to complete a review in a timely fashion and to do justice to the task in the available timeframe. They should also not accept review assignments for which they feel unqualified.
Reviewers who have accepted manuscript assignments are normally expected to submit their reviews within four weeks. They should recuse themselves from the assignment if it becomes apparent to them at any stage that they do not possess the required expertise to perform the review, or that they may have a potential conflict of interest in performing the review (e.g., one resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, institutions, or companies associated with the manuscript).
Privileged information or ideas obtained by reviewers through the peer review process must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents, and must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the Editors.
When conducting their reviews, reviewers are asked to do so as objectively as possible, refraining from engaging in personal criticism of the author(s). They are encouraged to express their views clearly, explaining and justifying all recommendations made. They should always attempt to provide detailed and constructive feedback to assist the author(s) in improving their work, even if the manuscript is, in their opinion, not publishable.
Reviewers should identify in their reviews relevant published work that has not been cited by the author(s), together with any instances in which proper attribution of sources has not been provided. They should call to the responsible editor’s attention any major resemblances between a manuscript under consideration and other published articles or papers of which they are aware, as well as any concerns they might have in relation to the ethical acceptability of the research reported in the manuscript.
Responsibilities of Editors
JMLE Editor has ultimate responsibility for deciding if a submitted manuscript should be published. The Journal is guided by its policies as determined by JMLE Editorial Board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The Editors may consult with Associate Editors and other members of the editorial team, as well as with reviewers, in making publication decisions.
The Editors will evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to the race, color, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the author(s). They will not disclose any information about a manuscript under consideration to anyone other than the author(s), reviewers and potential reviewers, and in some instances the Editorial Board members, as appropriate. Additionally, the Editors will make every effort to ensure the integrity of the blind review process by not revealing the identity of the author(s) of a manuscript to the reviewers of that manuscript, and vice versa.
When evaluating a manuscript for publication, in addition to considering standard criteria pertaining to the rigor of the manuscript, the quality of its presentation, and its contribution to humanity’s stock of knowledge, the Editors will also seek evidence that ethical harms have been minimized in conducting the reported research. They will question whether the benefits outweigh the harms in each particular study’s case. Since JMLE welcomes the submission of manuscripts from any country, it is necessary to recognize that laws and regulations regarding research ethics and ethical approval vary worldwide.
As such, the Editors may need to seek clarification in this regard with the author(s) and request that they supply a letter from the relevant institutional ethics committee or board that approved the research. The Editors will be guided by CORE’s Guidelines for Retracting Articles when considering retracting, issuing expressions of concern pertaining to articles that have been published in the Journal, and issuing corrections. They are committed to working closely with research organizations and institutions in line with CORE’s advice on Cooperation between Research Institutions and Journals on Research Integrity Cases.