Journal of Media Literacy Education Pre-Prints

Document Type

Research Article

Abstract

Scholars have long emphasized the harmful effects of overtly sexist and oppressive media images on young people’s understandings of sex and relationships. Yet, this emphasis on explicit harm leaves a gap in understanding how college students interpret subtle, hidden, and ambiguous media messages. To address this gap, we asked 196 California college students at a large public university to critique a range of mainstream media content—from overtly oppressive, to affirming of nondominant gender identities, to containing mixed messages about empowerment and oppression. Responses were coded using our media literacy scoring guide for assessing students’ ability to critically analyze media messages about sex and relationships. Results showed that students were most familiar with and adept at evaluating sexualize celebrity media content. They struggled when images featured unknown models conveying mixed or ambiguous messages, such as a scene that could be read as a mutual kiss while also reinforcing dominant beauty and attractiveness ideals. These findings, alongside the proposed scoring guide, offer a framework for strengthening critical media literacy education and research that addresses how meaning is constructed through ambiguity, contradiction, and subtle cues in everyday media texts.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.