Date of Award

2026

Degree Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy in Marine Affairs

Department

Marine Affairs

First Advisor

Tracey Dalton

Second Advisor

Lisa Hiwasaki

Abstract

As an archipelagic State with high levels of biodiversity, Indonesia has adopted international marine conservation objectives, specifically the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) and its "30x30" target, into its national policy. To meet these global commitments, Indonesia has been expanding its network of Marine Protected Areas and Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (OECMs) while improving their management effectiveness. However, a disconnect exists between these high-level policy ambitions and the realities experienced by coastal communities and field-level implementers of marine conservation efforts. While numbers indicate progress towards meeting area-based targets and in increasing self-assessed management effectiveness scores, this technical achievement masks challenges in addressing the social, political, and cultural aspects of marine resource access and governance. This dissertation examines the institutional dynamics and mechanisms driving this disconnect. By integrating concepts of coloniality, resource governmentality, social-ecological systems, and access theory, I argue that Indonesia’s state governance mechanism navigates these inherent complexities through a process of technocratic translation.

To investigate this, I employ a multi-scale, mixed-methods approach that draws on policy analysis, practitioner surveys, in-depth interviews, and field observations. First, I trace the colonialities within contemporary conservation laws, arguing that they operate within a framework that retains centralized administrative structures. Second, I demonstrate how global biodiversity targets are translated into national strategies that tend to emphasize technical metrics, often at the expense of socio-political substance. Third, I examine the structural constraints faced by field-level implementers who must balance their roles between facilitating bottom-up governance and serving as “surrogate bureaucrats” to support the State in the technical implementation of marine conservation. Finally, I present a case study from Rote Island that highlights the local implications of these structures, showing how marine conservation and resource governance with only symbolic levels of community participation can introduce barriers to local resource access.

This dissertation concludes that the current implementation gap is not a reflection of low technical capacity or malicious intent. Instead, it is a systemic outcome of a technocratic governance approach with deep roots in coloniality. By focusing on technical legibility, the current system struggles to fully address social equity and access. To support the government’s goal of equitable and effective marine conservation, this study recommends that marine conservation and resource governance mechanisms shift away from purely technical management toward an integrated model that legally recognizes customary institutions and safeguards local access rights as core design elements.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.