Some issues in the application of cohesive zone models for metal-ceramic interfaces
Document Type
Article
Date of Original Version
5-21-2002
Abstract
Cohesive zone models (CZMs) are being increasingly used to simulate discrete fracture processes in a number of homogeneous and inhomogeneous material systems. The models are typically expressed as a function of normal and tangential tractions in terms of separation distances. The forms of the functions and parameters vary from model to model. In this work, two different forms of CZMs (exponential and bilinear) are used to evaluate the response of interfaces in titanium matrix composites reinforced by silicon carbide (SCS-6) fibers. The computational results are then compared to thin slice push-out experimental data. It is observed that the bilinear CZM reproduces the macroscopic mechanical response and the failure process while the exponential form fails to do so. From the numerical simulations, the parameters that describe the bilinear CZM are determined. The sensitivity of the various cohesive zone parameters in predicting the overall interfacial mechanical response (as observed in the thin-slice push out test) is carefully examined. Many researchers have suggested that two independent parameters (the cohesive energy, and either of the cohesive strength or the separation displacement) are sufficient to model cohesive zones implying that the form (shape) of the traction-separation equations is unimportant. However, it is shown in this work that in addition to the two independent parameters, the form of the traction-separation equations for CZMs plays a very critical role in determining the macroscopic mechanical response of the composite system. © 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Publication Title, e.g., Journal
International Journal of Solids and Structures
Volume
39
Issue
10
Citation/Publisher Attribution
Chandra, N., H. Li, C. Shet, and H. Ghonem. "Some issues in the application of cohesive zone models for metal-ceramic interfaces." International Journal of Solids and Structures 39, 10 (2002): 2827-2855. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00149-X.