Document Type
Article
Date of Original Version
2020
Abstract
Ports are a cornerstone of the local, state, and national economy, especially for coastal cities. However, ports face growing economic challenges that require infrastructure financing, and a relevant avenue of securing funds is through government assistance via bond issues. We examine voter support for the public financing of port infrastructure investments using a 2016 referendum in Rhode Island. Through our multiple regression voting model, we find strong evidence that public spending on ports in Rhode Island was more of a bipartisan issue compared to other public financing efforts on the ballot. Additionally, neighborhoods with a larger minority presence and those with higher median per capita income were more likely to support port development. In contrast, areas with a higher homeowner population and those communities farther from ports were less likely to support port spending. As a key novelty to our paper, we use our voting model results to forecast how a hypothetical port infrastructure bond might fare in other states, and find that regardless of socioeconomic and political differences, all coastal states in the US would be expected to pass a port referendum.
Citation/Publisher Attribution
Jarron VanCeylon, Corey Lang & Austin Becker (2020) Whatever floats your vote: understanding voter support for public port infrastructure investments, Maritime Policy & Management, DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2020.1754478
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2020.1754478
Comment
Jarron VanCeylon and Corey Lang are from the Department of Environmental and Natural Resource Economics.
Austin Becker is from the Department of Marine Affairs.
Author Manuscript
This is a pre-publication author manuscript of the final, published article.
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable
towards Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth in our Terms of Use.
