Evaluating impacts of marine governance on human communities: Testing aspects of a human impact assessment model
Document Type
Article
Date of Original Version
7-1-2019
Abstract
A human impact assessment (HIA) model was developed to guide research to understand how changes in a fishery can impact fishermen and fishing communities. Path analysis demonstrates that job satisfaction is an important variable intervening between marine governance and well-being. Individual-level variables in the demographic latent variable influence aspects of job satisfaction as well as well-being. It is variance in management that influences satisfaction with fishing which has a direct effect on well-being. In the HIA model, the three components of job satisfaction (self-actualization, income, and psycho-social) have the greatest total impact on well-being. The model also indicates complex relationships between management, fishing activity attributes, job satisfaction, and individual and social attributes. Relationships between community context and differences in job satisfaction in the Northeast and Alaska regions confirmed that these factors, also included in the HIA model, are important aspects of impact assessment. Results help to show that changes in ocean governance have impacts on the human communities who use these important resources. To anticipate and ameliorate potential impacts on human well-being as indicated by tools such as the HIA model, research needs to be accomplished to appropriately design and account for these impacts.
Publication Title, e.g., Journal
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
Volume
77
Citation/Publisher Attribution
Pollnac, Richard B., Courtney Carothers, Tarsila Seara, and John J. Poggie. "Evaluating impacts of marine governance on human communities: Testing aspects of a human impact assessment model." Environmental Impact Assessment Review 77, (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2019.02.001.