Precision of the current methods to measure the alkenone proxy U37K′ and absolute alkenone abundance in sediments: Results of an interlaboratory comparison study

Authors

A. Rosell-Melé, Durham University
E. Bard, Centre Européen de Recherche et d’Enseignement de Géosciences de l’Environnement
K. C. Emeis, The Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research
J. O. Grimalt, CSIC - Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo Pascual Vila (CID)
P. Müller, Universität Bremen
R. Schneider, Universität Bremen
I. Bouloubassi, Observatoire Océanologique de Villefranche Sur Mer
B. Epstein, University of Rhode Island
K. Fahl, Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung
A. Fluegge, Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung
K. Freeman, Pennsylvania State University
M. Goñi, University of South Carolina
U. Güntner, Universität Oldenburg
D. Hartz, University of South Carolina
S. Hellebust, Newcastle University
T. Herbert, Brown University
M. Ikehara, Hokkaido University
R. Ishiwatari, Tokyo Metropolitan University
K. Kawamura, Hokkaido University
F. Kenig, University of Illinois at Chicago
J. De Leeuw, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research
S. Lehman, University of Colorado Boulder
L. Mejanelle, Observatoire Océanologique de Villefranche Sur Mer
N. Ohkouchi, Hokkaido University
R. D. Pancost, Pennsylvania State University
C. Pelejero, CSIC - Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo Pascual Vila (CID)
F. Prahl, Oregon State University
J. Quinn, University of Rhode Island
J. F. Rontani, Aix Marseille Université
F. Rostek, Centre Européen de Recherche et d’Enseignement de Géosciences de l’Environnement
J. Rullkötter, Universität Oldenburg
J. Sachs, University of Colorado Boulder
T. Blanz, GEOMAR - Helmholtz-Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel
K. Sawada, University of Tsukuba
D. Schulz-Bull, GEOMAR - Helmholtz-Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel
E. Sikes, University of Auckland

Document Type

Article

Date of Original Version

7-1-2001

Abstract

Measurements of the U37K′ index and the absolute abundance of alkenones in marine sediments are increasingly used in paleoceanographic research as proxies of past sea surface temperature and haptophyte (mainly coccolith-bearing species) primary productivity, respectively. An important aspect of these studies is to be able to compare reliably data obtained by different laboratories from a wide variety of locations. Hence the intercomparability of data produced by the research community is essential. Here we report results from an anonymous interlaboratory comparison study involving 24 of the leading laboratories that carry out alkenone measurements worldwide. The majority of laboratories produce data that are intercomparable within the considered confidence limits. For the measurement of alkenone concentrations, however, there are systematic biases between laboratories, which might be related to the techniques employed to quantify the components. The maximum difference between any two laboratories for any two single measurements of U37K′ in sediments is estimated, with a probability of 95%, to be <2.1°C. In addition, the overall within-laboratory precision for the U37K′ temperature estimates is estimated to be <1.6°C (95% probability). Similarly, from the analyses of alkenone concentrations the interlaboratory reproducibility is estimated at 32%, and the repeatability is estimated at 24%. The former is compared to a theoretical estimate of reproducibility and found to be excessively high. Hence there is certainly scope and a demonstrable need to improve reproducibility and repeatability of U37K′ and especially alkenone quantification data across the community of scientists involved in alkenone research.

Publication Title, e.g., Journal

Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems

Volume

2

Issue

7

Share

COinS