Document Type
Article
Date of Original Version
2015
Abstract
Purpose
This paper introduces a game-like decision tool – “Greatest Good Donations Calculator (GGDC)”, which has been collaboratively developed by scholars from the University of Rhode Island and the USAID Center for International Disaster Information.
Design/methodology/approach
The study is grounded in two streams of research – human learning through games and systems dynamics literature. The problem of “unsolicited in-kind donations” is discussed followed by the development of the GGDC.
Findings
The GGDC is a game-like decision tool that informs users on some of the complexities associated with humanitarian supply chains, and the ineffective nature of unsolicited in-kind donations compared to monetary contributions when sent in response to international disasters.
Research limitations/implications
The GGDC could be made more interactive and playable that could improve user engagement. The GGDC’s value to the humanitarian community and public could also be measured in other ways, such as surveys and A/B split tests after a major donation campaign.
Practical implications
Games, simulations and game-like tools could successfully be used to educate donors about smart compassion.
Originality/value
This is the first paper to introduce the GGDC to the humanitarian logistics community with detailed content about (i) positioning the study in the academic literature, and (ii) stages of development. Scholars, searching to adopt games or developing new games for the humanitarian world may find the information valuable.The GGDC is a unique example of federal government - academia collaboration in raising public awareness of the unsolicited good donations problem.
Citation/Publisher Attribution
- Koray Özpolat, Juanita Rilling, Nezih Altay, Eric Chavez, (2015) "Engaging donors in smart compassion: USAID CIDI’s Greatest Good Donation Calculator", Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, Vol. 5 Iss: 1. Available: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/JHLSCM-11-2013-0041
Author Manuscript
This is a pre-publication author manuscript of the final, published article.
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable
towards Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth in our Terms of Use.